Ekspertiza xulosasining isbotlash vositasi sifatidagi o‘rni va ahamiyati

ASL MANBA
Ushbu maqola dastlab INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NATURAL AND SOCIAL-HUMANITARIAN SCIENCES jurnalida nashr etilgan.

Fatullayev Shodmonbek, Fatullayev Shodmonbek (2026) Ekspertiza xulosasining isbotlash vositasi sifatidagi o‘rni va ahamiyati. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NATURAL AND SOCIAL-HUMANITARIAN SCIENCES, 3 (3). pp. 34-50.

[thumbnail of 34-50.pdf] PDF
34-50.pdf - Published Version

Download (436kB)

Annotatsiya

This thesis provides a comprehensive analysis of the role and significance of expert opinion as a means of proof within the framework of criminal procedural legislation. It examines the legal nature of expert opinion, the procedure for its appointment and conduct, its place in the system of evidence, and its interrelation with other means of proof. Particular attention is given to the criteria for evaluating expert opinion, including reliability, objectivity, scientific validity, and compliance with procedural requirements.
The thesis substantiates that expert opinion plays a decisive role in resolving criminal cases, especially in establishing circumstances that require specialized knowledge. Its features as both incriminating and exculpatory evidence, its role in shaping the internal conviction of the court, and its importance in ensuring fair judgments are highlighted. In addition, the study analyzes the development trends and current issues of the forensic examination institution based on existing criminal procedural legislation, judicial practice, and scholarly approaches.
As a result, it is concluded that expert opinion is an essential means of proof in criminal proceedings, contributing to the establishment of truth, strengthening the evidentiary basis, and ensuring the legality and validity of judicial decisions.

Hujjat turi: Maqola
Mualliflar:
Muallif
Email
Fatullayev Shodmonbek, Fatullayev Shodmonbek
UNSPECIFIED
Jurnal / Nashr: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NATURAL AND SOCIAL-HUMANITARIAN SCIENCES
Jild: 3
Soni: 3
Sahifalar: pp. 34-50
Sana: 30 Aprel 2026
Kalit so'zlar: expert opinion, means of proof, criminal procedure, criminal procedural law, system of evidence, expert, forensic examination, specialized knowledge, admissibility of evidence, reliability, objectivity, scientific validity, procedural procedure, appointment of expertise, additional expertise, repeated expertise, incriminating evidence, exculpatory evidence, internal conviction of the court, evaluation of evidence, judicial practice, investigation process, forensic medical examination, criminalistics, DNA analysis, forensic psychology, economic expertise, digital forensics, causal relationship, corpus delicti, sufficiency of evidence, validity of judicial decisions, powers of the expert, rights of participants in proceedings.
URI: https://arxiv.universalpublishings.com/id/eprint/98957
Amallar
[pin missing: title]
[pin missing: title]