MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERVENTIONS VERSUS LAPAROTOMY IN PERFORATED GASTRODUODENAL ULCERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EARLY OUTCOMES

ASL MANBA
Ushbu maqola dastlab INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE jurnalida nashr etilgan.

Davranov Alisher, Davranov Alisher (2026) MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERVENTIONS VERSUS LAPAROTOMY IN PERFORATED GASTRODUODENAL ULCERS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EARLY OUTCOMES. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE, 3 (3). p. 316.

[thumbnail of 316.pdf] PDF
316.pdf - Published Version

Download (113kB)

Annotatsiya

Perforated gastroduodenal ulcer remains one of the most common surgical emergencies and is associated with substantial postoperative morbidity and mortality. Conventional management based on wide laparotomy and forced radical operations is accompanied by a high incidence of purulent-septic and wound complications and prolonged rehabilitation. The expanding role of laparoscopic and video-assisted techniques requires objective evidence comparing their early results with those of traditional open surgery.
 

Hujjat turi: Maqola
Mualliflar:
Muallif
Email
Davranov Alisher, Davranov Alisher
UNSPECIFIED
Jurnal / Nashr: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE
Jild: 3
Soni: 3
Sahifalar: p. 316
Sana: 30 Mart 2026
URI: https://arxiv.universalpublishings.com/id/eprint/93394
Amallar
[pin missing: title]
[pin missing: title]