TY  - JOUR
UR  - https://universalconference.us/index.php/ICNSHS/article/view/7121
EP  - 50
ID  - arxiv98957
KW  - expert opinion
KW  -  means of proof
KW  -  criminal procedure
KW  -  criminal procedural law
KW  -  system of evidence
KW  -  expert
KW  -  forensic examination
KW  -  specialized knowledge
KW  -  admissibility of evidence
KW  -  reliability
KW  -  objectivity
KW  -  scientific validity
KW  -  procedural procedure
KW  -  appointment of expertise
KW  -  additional expertise
KW  -  repeated expertise
KW  -  incriminating evidence
KW  -  exculpatory evidence
KW  -  internal conviction of the court
KW  -  evaluation of evidence
KW  -  judicial practice
KW  -  investigation process
KW  -  forensic medical examination
KW  -  criminalistics
KW  -  DNA analysis
KW  -  forensic psychology
KW  -  economic expertise
KW  -  digital forensics
KW  -  causal relationship
KW  -  corpus delicti
KW  -  sufficiency of evidence
KW  -  validity of judicial decisions
KW  -  powers of the expert
KW  -  rights of participants in proceedings.
JF  - INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NATURAL AND SOCIAL-HUMANITARIAN SCIENCES
TI  - Ekspertiza xulosasining isbotlash vositasi sifatidagi o?rni va ahamiyati
N2  - This thesis provides a comprehensive analysis of the role and significance of expert opinion as a means of proof within the framework of criminal procedural legislation. It examines the legal nature of expert opinion, the procedure for its appointment and conduct, its place in the system of evidence, and its interrelation with other means of proof. Particular attention is given to the criteria for evaluating expert opinion, including reliability, objectivity, scientific validity, and compliance with procedural requirements.
The thesis substantiates that expert opinion plays a decisive role in resolving criminal cases, especially in establishing circumstances that require specialized knowledge. Its features as both incriminating and exculpatory evidence, its role in shaping the internal conviction of the court, and its importance in ensuring fair judgments are highlighted. In addition, the study analyzes the development trends and current issues of the forensic examination institution based on existing criminal procedural legislation, judicial practice, and scholarly approaches.
As a result, it is concluded that expert opinion is an essential means of proof in criminal proceedings, contributing to the establishment of truth, strengthening the evidentiary basis, and ensuring the legality and validity of judicial decisions.
IS  - 3
AV  - public
Y1  - 2026/04/30/
SP  - 34
VL  - 3
A1  - Fatullayev Shodmonbek, Fatullayev Shodmonbek
ER  -