eprintid: 93392
rev_number: 3
eprint_status: archive
dir: disk0/00/09/33/92
datestamp: 2026-06-19 03:18:31
lastmod: 2026-06-19 03:18:31
status_changed: 2026-06-19 03:18:31
type: article
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Urozov Nuʼmonjon, Urozov Nuʼmonjon
title: MINIMALLY INVASIVE BILIARY DRAINAGE VERSUS PALLIATIVE SURGICAL BILIODIGESTIVE ANASTOMOSES IN MALIGNANT OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE: IMMEDIATE OUTCOMES
ispublished: pub
abstract: Malignant obstructive jaundice caused by tumors of the hepatopancreatoduodenal zone is associated with high postoperative morbidity and a mortality of 10–35%. Although endoscopic, percutaneous and combined minimally invasive drainage techniques have largely replaced open palliative surgery, the comparative early safety of these approaches in routine clinical practice — where minimally invasive methods are often applied to the most debilitated patients — requires further evidence.
 
date: 2026-03-30
official_url: https://universalconference.us/index.php/icms/article/view/7371
full_text_status: public
publication: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE
volume: 3
number: 3
pagerange: 318
citation:   Urozov Nuʼmonjon, Urozov Nuʼmonjon  (2026) MINIMALLY INVASIVE BILIARY DRAINAGE VERSUS PALLIATIVE SURGICAL BILIODIGESTIVE ANASTOMOSES IN MALIGNANT OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE: IMMEDIATE OUTCOMES.  INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE, 3 (3).  p. 318.      
document_url: https://arxiv.universalpublishings.com/id/eprint/93392/1/318.pdf