TY  - JOUR
Y1  - 2026/02/27/
AV  - public
A1  - Shokhjakhon Oybekov, Shokhjakhon Oybekov
SP  - 711
VL  - 6
EP  - 718
ID  - arxiv93312
UR  - https://mjstjournal.com/index.php/mjst/article/view/7350
IS  - 2
N2  - This study examines transparency and accountability in higher education financing through a comparative analysis of Indonesia and Uzbekistan. Using a qualitative documentary approach, the research draws on audited government financial reports, official ministerial accountability documents, and sustainability performance indicators to evaluate financing governance structures and institutional outcomes. The analysis focuses on observable transparency measures, including budget realization discipline, financial reporting standards, audit coverage, and corrective enforcement actions. The findings show that Indonesia demonstrates a reporting-centered accountability model characterized by standardized audited statements and structured disclosure practices, while Uzbekistan reflects an enforcement-centered model with intensive audit controls and corrective financial interventions. Comparative results indicate that stronger reporting transparency and integrated accountability mechanisms are associated with higher institutional sustainability performance and better international ranking positions, as reflected in UI GreenMetric indicators. The study concludes that accountability architecture ? rather than funding volume alone ? plays a decisive role in translating public financing into measurable institutional performance and global competitiveness in higher education.
SN  - 2582-4686
TI  - TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCING: INDONESIA AND UZBEKISTAN
JF  - Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology
KW  - Higher education financing
KW  -  Financial transparency
KW  -  Accountability mechanisms
KW  -  Audited financial reports
KW  -  Education governance
KW  -  Comparative analysis
KW  -  Indonesia
KW  -  Uzbekistan
KW  -  UI GreenMetric.
ER  -