…
comment: The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
primary topic: COMPARING THE AUDIO-LINGUAL METHOD AND TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE IN THE MODERN EFL CLASSROOM

COMPARING THE AUDIO-LINGUAL METHOD AND TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE IN THE MODERN EFL CLASSROOM
type: AcademicArticle
type: Article
abstract: In EFL (English as a Foreign Language) contexts, classical teaching methods such as the Audio-Lingual Method (ALM) and Total Physical Response (TPR) have long histories but are often overlooked in favor of communicative and task-based approaches. This article compares ALM and TPR, exploring their theoretical foundations, strengths and weaknesses, and how they can be adapted for modern multilingual classrooms. Drawing on recent empirical studies (especially from 2021–2025), the discussion shows how ALM’s emphasis on habit formation and drill complements TPR’s embodied learning and kinesthetic involvement. The comparison is enriched by classroom reflections illustrating how a hybrid approach can balance accuracy and fluency, reduce learner anxiety, and increase engagement. Implications for teacher practice, curriculum design, and assessment are offered.
date: 2025-10-16
status: published
author list: authors
type: EPrint
type: ArticleEPrint
is part of: repository

Research Science and Innovation House
type: Organization

SYNAPSES: INSIGHTS ACROSS THE DISCIPLINES
type: Collection

Jumaniyazova Lobar Sirojiddin qizi
type: Person
given name: Jumaniyazova Lobar Sirojiddin
family name: qizi

HTML Summary of #86791 COMPARING THE AUDIO-LINGUAL METHOD AND TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE IN THE MODERN EFL CLASSROOM
format: text/html
primary topic: COMPARING THE AUDIO-LINGUAL METHOD AND TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE IN THE MODERN EFL CLASSROOM