{
      "date": "2026-01-29",
      "uri": "https://arxiv.universalpublishings.com/id/eprint/80295",
      "type": "article",
      "full_text_status": "none",
      "id_number": "oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16446",
      "userid": 1,
      "official_url": "https://universalpublishings.com/index.php/gumanitar/article/view/16446",
      "subjects": [
        "til kontakti, interferensiya, o\u2018zlashuv, kalkalash, negativ transfer, xatolik tahlili, interlanguage, focus on form, corrective feedback, korpus yondashuvi."
      ],
      "ispublished": "pub",
      "metadata_visibility": "show",
      "date_type": "published",
      "note": "Imported from Universal Publishings (OAI id oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/16446)",
      "rev_number": 1,
      "datestamp": "2026-05-26 16:13:07",
      "publisher": "Yangi O'zbekistonda Tabiiy  va Ijtimoiy-gumanitar fanlar respublika ilmiy amaliy konferensiyasi",
      "keywords": "til kontakti, interferensiya, o\u2018zlashuv, kalkalash, negativ transfer, xatolik tahlili, interlanguage, focus on form, corrective feedback, korpus yondashuvi.",
      "sword_depositor": 1,
      "dir": "disk0/00/08/02/95",
      "lastmod": "2026-05-26 16:13:07",
      "publication": "Yangi O'zbekistonda Tabiiy  va Ijtimoiy-gumanitar fanlar respublika ilmiy amaliy konferensiyasi",
      "eprint_status": "archive",
      "status_changed": "2026-05-26 16:13:07",
      "title": "TIL KONTAKTIDA INTERFERENSIYA: O\u2018ZLASHUV, XATOLIK VA O\u2018QITISH METODIKASI (O\u2018ZBEK\u2013INGLIZ KONTEKSTIDA)",
      "abstract": "Til kontaktlari kuchaygan sari \u201cinterferensiya\u201d hodisasi nafaqat ikki til orasidagi xatoliklar (negativ transfer), balki o\u2018zlashuv (qarz so\u2018zlar, kalkalar) va me\u2019yoriy raqobat (variantlilik) ko\u2018rinishida ham namoyon bo\u2018lmoqda. Ushbu maqolada interferensiya tilshunoslik va chet tilini o\u2018qitish nuqtayi nazaridan uch yo\u2018nalishda tahlil qilinadi: (1) o\u2018zlashuv (borrowing) \u2013 leksik va struktur birliklarning qabul qiluvchi tilga ijtimoiy ehtiyoj va prestij ta\u2019sirida singishi; (2) xatolik (error) \u2013 o\u2018rganuvchi nutqida L1 ta\u2019siri sabab yuzaga keladigan me\u2019yordan chetlanish; (3) metodik yechim \u2013 o\u2018qitishda diagnostika, kontrastiv anglash, korpusga tayangan \u201cnoticing\u201d va formaga yo\u2018naltirilgan yondashuvlar orqali salbiy interferensiyani kamaytirish. Tadqiqot dizayni ikkilamchi ma\u2019lumotlar (published data) asosida qiyosiy tahlilga qurildi: bir tomondan, ingliz tilidan o\u2018zlashgan birliklar ulushi 1989\u20131992 yillar mediasida keskin o\u2018zgarishi haqidagi korpus natijalari (foiz va chastotalar); ikkinchi tomondan, o\u2018zbek EFL o\u2018rganuvchilarining 40 ta inshosida aniqlangan 1 248 ta xatolik bo\u2018yicha kategoriyalar va ulushlar. Natijalar o\u2018zlashuv va xatolik mexanizmlari agenti, funksiyasi hamda me\u2019yor bilan munosabatida farqlanishini ko\u2018rsatadi: o\u2018zlashuv ko\u2018pincha ehtiyoj\u2013prestij\u2013institutsional me\u2019yor triadasiga bog\u2018liq bo\u2018lsa, xatolik kognitiv qayta ishlash, \u201cinterlanguage\u201d tizimi va e\u2019tibor resurslari bilan uzviy. Metodik jihatdan esa og\u2018zaki tuzatish (corrective feedback) bo\u2018yicha sinf sharoitidagi meta-tahlil natijalari (N=827) hamda formaga yo\u2018naltirilgan yondashuvlar interferensiyani kamaytirishda dalillangan samaradorlikka ega",
      "creators": [
        {
          "name": {
            "lineage": null,
            "family": "qizi",
            "given": "Abdulhamidova Latofat Baxrom",
            "honourific": null
          }
        },
        {
          "name": {
            "given": "Safarova Farida",
            "honourific": null,
            "lineage": null,
            "family": "Narmuratovna"
          }
        }
      ],
      "eprintid": 80295
    }