{
      "note": "Imported from MJST Journal (OAI id oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6961)",
      "metadata_visibility": "show",
      "date_type": "published",
      "ispublished": "pub",
      "official_url": "https://mjstjournal.com/index.php/mjst/article/view/6961",
      "subjects": [
        "Myocardial infarction, cardiac rehabilitation, quality of life, SF-36 questionnaire, secondary prevention, physical functioning, psychological adaptation."
      ],
      "userid": 1,
      "id_number": "oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/6961",
      "full_text_status": "none",
      "type": "article",
      "date": "2026-03-08",
      "uri": "https://arxiv.universalpublishings.com/id/eprint/65946",
      "eprintid": 65946,
      "creators": [
        {
          "name": {
            "honourific": null,
            "given": "Bustanov",
            "family": "Sherzodbek",
            "lineage": null
          }
        },
        {
          "name": {
            "family": "Nargiza",
            "lineage": null,
            "honourific": null,
            "given": "Bozarova"
          }
        }
      ],
      "abstract": "Myocardial infarction is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally, profoundly affecting patients' physical and psychological well-being. While survival rates have improved due to advanced acute interventions, long-term recovery heavily relies on effective cardiac rehabilitation. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of comprehensive rehabilitation programs on the quality of life of patients following a myocardial infarction. A prospective, randomized clinical trial was conducted involving 112 patients. Participants were divided into a main group (n=56) receiving a structured 12-week comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation program, and a control group (n=56) receiving standard outpatient care. Quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 Health Survey at baseline and after 6 months. Statistical analyses included Student's t-test and chi-square tests (p < 0.05). After 6 months, the main group demonstrated significant improvements in physical functioning (74.2 \u00b1 3.4 vs. 59.5 \u00b1 4.1, p < 0.01) and mental health (71.8 \u00b1 3.6 vs. 55.4 \u00b1 4.2, p < 0.01) compared to the control group. Furthermore, the absolute risk reduction for early hospital readmission was 14.2% (95% CI: 8.5 - 19.9). In conclusion, the implementation of a systematic, multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation program significantly enhances both the physical and psycho-emotional components of quality of life in post-myocardial infarction patients, emphasizing the critical need for its integration into primary healthcare protocols.",
      "status_changed": "2026-05-26 15:56:03",
      "title": "IMPACT OF REHABILITATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION ON THE PATIENT'S QUALITY OF LIFE",
      "eprint_status": "archive",
      "lastmod": "2026-05-26 15:56:03",
      "publication": "Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology",
      "sword_depositor": 1,
      "dir": "disk0/00/06/59/46",
      "keywords": "Myocardial infarction, cardiac rehabilitation, quality of life, SF-36 questionnaire, secondary prevention, physical functioning, psychological adaptation.",
      "publisher": "Center for Tech and Media Research",
      "rev_number": 1,
      "datestamp": "2026-05-26 15:56:03"
    }