<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>THE PROBLEM OF TRUTH IN PHILOSOPHY</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Kazimova</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">G.Kh.</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>In this article, we will address the important question of how we can best reflect reality in our work. There are two main approaches – through direct observation and through reflection. At the heart of this discussion is a typology of knowledge that classifies it into rational and emotional, phenomenalist and essentialistic, empirical and theoretical, fundamental and applied, philosophical and specifically scientific.&amp;nbsp; natural sciences and humanities. It is important to consider that each of these types of knowledge has its own characteristics and applications.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2024-04-14</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Center for Tech and Media Research</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Maqola</mods:genre></mods:mods>