TY  - JOUR
JF  - Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology
PB  - Center for Tech and Media Research
N2  - The legislative consolidation of the institution of administrative prejudice is inconsistent. This creates difficulties in defining its boundaries in the understanding and application of the relevant rules. Itself administrative collateral estoppel deserves a critical eye. It violates the principle of non bis in idem; shifts the basis of criminal responsibility towards the personality of the offender; blurs the boundaries between crime and administrative offence. Its existence is actually allocated among administrative offences special group of torts, which occupies its public danger an intermediate position between administrative great-wonarishinani and crimes. This result unnecessarily complicates the system of public offences.
TI  - SOME QUESTION ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE
N1  - Imported from MJST Journal (OAI id oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/270)
A1  - Uktamovich, Kholikov Farkhad
AV  - none
Y1  - 2023/10/31/
UR  - https://mjstjournal.com/index.php/mjst/article/view/270
KW  - administrative prejudice
KW  -  repeatability
KW  -  non bis in idem
KW  -  danger of personality
KW  -  crime
KW  -  administrative offence.
ID  - arxiv51641
ER  -