…
comment: The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
primary topic: SOME QUESTION ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE

SOME QUESTION ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE
type: AcademicArticle
type: Article
abstract: The legislative consolidation of the institution of administrative prejudice is inconsistent. This creates difficulties in defining its boundaries in the understanding and application of the relevant rules. Itself administrative collateral estoppel deserves a critical eye. It violates the principle of non bis in idem; shifts the basis of criminal responsibility towards the personality of the offender; blurs the boundaries between crime and administrative offence. Its existence is actually allocated among administrative offences special group of torts, which occupies its public danger an intermediate position between administrative great-wonarishinani and crimes. This result unnecessarily complicates the system of public offences.
date: 2023-10-31
status: published
author list: authors
type: EPrint
type: ArticleEPrint
is part of: repository

Center for Tech and Media Research
type: Organization

Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology
type: Collection

Kholikov Farkhad Uktamovich
type: Person
given name: Kholikov Farkhad
family name: Uktamovich

HTML Summary of #51641 SOME QUESTION ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE
format: text/html
primary topic: SOME QUESTION ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE