Arxiv Universal PublishingsSOME QUESTION ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICEKholikov FarkhadUktamovichauthorThe legislative consolidation of the institution of administrative prejudice is inconsistent. This creates difficulties in defining its boundaries in the understanding and application of the relevant rules. Itself administrative collateral estoppel deserves a critical eye. It violates the principle of non bis in idem; shifts the basis of criminal responsibility towards the personality of the offender; blurs the boundaries between crime and administrative offence. Its existence is actually allocated among administrative offences special group of torts, which occupies its public danger an intermediate position between administrative great-wonarishinani and crimes. This result unnecessarily complicates the system of public offences.2023-10-31Center for Tech and Media ResearchMaqola

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Arxiv Universal Publishings the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Arxiv Universal Publishings does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Arxiv Universal Publishings is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the Deposit Item Now button indicates your agreement to these terms.