https://arxiv.universalpublishings.com/id/eprint/51641 2026-05-26T15:34:19Z info:eu-repo/semantics/descriptiveMetadata https://arxiv.universalpublishings.com/id/eprint/51641/ SOME QUESTION ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE Uktamovich, Kholikov Farkhad The legislative consolidation of the institution of administrative prejudice is inconsistent. This creates difficulties in defining its boundaries in the understanding and application of the relevant rules. Itself administrative collateral estoppel deserves a critical eye. It violates the principle of non bis in idem; shifts the basis of criminal responsibility towards the personality of the offender; blurs the boundaries between crime and administrative offence. Its existence is actually allocated among administrative offences special group of torts, which occupies its public danger an intermediate position between administrative great-wonarishinani and crimes. This result unnecessarily complicates the system of public offences. Center for Tech and Media Research 2023-10-31 Maqola NonPeerReviewed Uktamovich, Kholikov Farkhad (2023) SOME QUESTION ABOUT ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE. Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology. https://mjstjournal.com/index.php/mjst/article/view/270 oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/270 oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/270 info:eu-repo/semantics/humanStartPage