<mods:mods xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" version="3.3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Evaluation of the Performance of Medical Laboratories in Malaria  Microscopical Examination in El Obeid City-North Kordofan State</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Hassan Yousif Adam Regal</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Hassan Yousif Adam Regal</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Ahmed Bakheet Abd Alla</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Ahmed Bakheet Abd Alla</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>External quality assessment (EQA) and Internal Quality control (IQC) are an alternative tool to cross-checking of blood slides in the quality control of malaria microscopy. This study was aimed to check EQA and IQA of malaria microscopy in El Obeid City North Kordofan. A total of 76 laboratories (55%private and 45%public) were participated in the study.&#13;
A well-designed questionnaire plus five blood films (two negative and three positive films with different parasitaemia; (low, moderate and high) were distributed for each laboratory under study. Two slides (stained and unstained) blood films and one ml of Geimsa stain were collected from each laboratory.&#13;
The&amp;nbsp; study&amp;nbsp; revealed that,&amp;nbsp; most of&amp;nbsp; laboratories&amp;nbsp; were&amp;nbsp; using&amp;nbsp; Geimsa,&amp;nbsp; but&amp;nbsp; the EQA&amp;nbsp; and IQC for both staff&amp;nbsp; and stain&amp;nbsp; were demonstrated poor performance. Although, only 20% had a record for malaria results, 50% of laboratories reporting only whether the parasite identified or not. 75% were using only thick blood film. The results of the five blood films were; 61% were correct clear negative, 49% were negative with artifacts, while the three positive slides were correctly as follows; low (49%), moderate (76%) and (59%) of high parasite density.&#13;
The major errors include; not reporting the density of malaria low (50%), moderate (31%) and high parasite (13%), but those reporting wrong were low ( 24%,) moderate (39%) and high parasite (24%).&#13;
The study concludes that, the EQA and IQC of microscopical examinations for malaria parasite in laboratories in ElObeid were acceptable,further training courses and effective quality assurance scheme were needed.</mods:abstract><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2024-05-04</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Maqola</mods:genre></mods:mods>